Buscar
Mostrando ítems 1-10 de 14
Sentencia 53/1985
(Tribunal Constitucional de España, 1985)
Texto íntegro de la sentencia del Tribunal constitucional 53/1985, de 11 de abril, sobre la constitucionalidad de la ley despenalizadora del aborto en determinados supuestos
La antiprogesterona RU 486
(IPPF, 1986)
Durante los últimos años se ha estado sometiendo a pruebas clínicas la antiptogesterona RU 486 (Mifepristone) y muy pronto se empezará con la práctica clínica. Se comenta sobre su usos clínico y sobre sus consecuencias legales
Tribunal Constitucional, Sentencia S.T.C. 53/1985, 1985-49 BJC 515, 11 de abril de 1985. Sentencia en español
(1985)
Upheld constitutionality of draft law decriminalizing abortion in cases of risk to physical or mental health of woman, cases of rape, and fetal malformation; law had procedural defects which needed correction; law was ...
Corte de Apelaciones del Segundo Distrito de California, Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital, 208 Cal. App. 3d 405; 256 Cal. Rptr. 240 (1989). Sentencia en inglés
(1989)
Catholic hospital did not violate a law when it (1) refused to provide emergency contraception to a rape victim and (2) refused to inform her that she could obtain emergency contraception from a health professional within ...
Corte Suprema de Canadá, R. v. Morgentaler [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30, 44 D.L.R. (4th) 385, 28 de enero de 1988., Sentencia en Inglés
(1988-01)
Decriminalized abortion in Canada; law that allowed abortion only at certified hospitals after approval by an abortion committee is unconstitutional due to excessive requirements and delay in accessing services.
Cámara de los Lores, Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. 3 All E.R. 402 (1985). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1985)
[doctors can provide advice and contraceptives to girls under the age of 16 without their parents' knowledge or consent]
Paton (W.P.) v. United Kingdom, App. No. 8416/78, Eur. Comm’n H.R. (1980). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1980)
[man's application surrounding his partner having an abortion without his consent declared inadmissible; Commission noted that this claim was manifestly ill-founded and the woman had the abortion to protect her own life]
Resolución No. 23/81, Caso 2141 (“Baby Boy”) interpuesto por los Sres. White y Potter contra los Estados Unidos de América, OAS/Ser.L/V/II.54, doc. 9 rev. 1, 6 de marzo de 1981. Sentencia en español.
(1981)
[Abortion scheme in US did not violate the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man nor the American Convention on Human Rights; right to life does not begin at conception in the Declaration, which prevails ...
Cámara de los Lores, Royal College of Nurses v. Department of Health and Social Security [1981] 1 All E.R. 545.
(1981)
[nurses are legally protected from liability when they are involved in abortions in accordance with the 1967 Abortion Act]
Brüggemann and Scheuten v. Federal Republic of Germany, App. No. 6959/75 (1981) 3 E.H.R.R. 244. Sentencia en Inglés
(1981)
[German law which criminalized abortion except under certain circumstances did not breach Article 8; a woman’s private life becomes closely connected with the developing fetus]