Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016). Decision online. Backup copy. Commentary on case from Planned Parenthood.
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-02T19:57:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-05-02T19:57:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1815 | |
| dc.description.abstract | ATexas law which required abortion providers to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centres and that abortion providers must have admitting privileges at a hosptial within 30 miles was declared unconstitutional as they created an undue burden for women seeking an abortion.] | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | en | es_ES |
| dc.title | Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016). Decision online. Backup copy. Commentary on case from Planned Parenthood. | es_ES |
| dc.type | Other | es_ES |
Arquivos deste item
Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)
-
Implementación [125]
-
Jurisprudencia [183]
-
Estados Unidos [33]



