Documentos de estándares internacionales: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 21-40 de 64
-
R.R. v. Poland, App. No. 27617/04, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2011). Sentencia en Inglés.
(2011)[Poland violated applicant’s rights to freedom from inhumane and degrading treatment and respect for private life by denying her timely access to diagnostic tests and information which would have enabled her to decide ... -
Pichon and Sajous v. France, Case No. 49853/99, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2001) Sentencia en inglés
(2001)[pharmacist complaint inadmissible; pharmacists cannot, based on their religious beliefs, refuse to sell contraceptives that have been prescribed by doctor] -
Siobhàn Whelan v. Ireland, Comm. No. 2425/2014: Ireland 12/06/2017, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/119/D/2425/2014 (UN Human Rights Committee), 12 June 2017, [Woman forced to travel to the UK for an abortion after fatal fetal abnormality diagnosis. Abortion laws are "cruel and inhumane."] Sentencia en linea. Extra copia en español.
(2017)[Woman forced to travel to the UK for an abortion after fatal fetal abnormality diagnosis. Abortion laws are "cruel and inhumane".] -
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland, CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013, March 31, 2017, published November 17, 2016 (United Nations, Human Rights Committee). Sentencia. Extra copia en español
(2017)[Woman was forced to travel to obtain an abortion as Ireland banned abortion in cases of fatal fetal abnormality. Ireland's law was found in violation of the ICCPR and the government was asked to change its law.] -
Comunicación Nº1608/2007, L.M.R. v. Argentina, Decisión de 28 de abril de 2011, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/101/D/1608/2007.. Sentencia en español.
(2011)[Raped woman with a mental disability experienced significant delay in trying to obtain a legal abortion; by the time she could obtain an abortion it was denied on the basis that the pregnancy was too advanced which caused ... -
P. and S. v. Poland, App. No. 57375/08, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2012). Sentencia en Inglés
(2012)[Poland violated rights of a minor who sought a legal abortion after rape. Minor was subjected to: doctor’s refusal to help and refusal to provide a referral; distorted information about the law; detention in a juvenile ... -
Open Door Counselling and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland, App. Nos. 14234/88 and14235/88, Eur. Ct. H.R. (1992). Sentencia en español
(1992)[restrictions that prevented two non-governmental organizations from informing pregnant women about abortion clinics in Great Britain were deemed a violation of freedom of expression in Article 10; Ireland sought to rely ... -
Kiyutin v. Russia, App. No. 2700/10, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2011). Sentencia en español
(2011)[Russia's refusal of a residence permit to an HIV+ man to live his wife and child violated the right to nondiscrimination in the exercise of private life; example of stereotyping and stigmatization cited by Rebecca Cook, ... -
Grimmark v. Sweden, App. No. 43726/17, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2020) Sentencia en Inglés.
(2020)Sweden's decision not to hire midwives who refused to participate in abortions complied with Article 9, since the freedom to manifest one's religious beliefs is subject to qualifications; applicant's complaint was deemed ... -
D. v. Ireland, App. No. 26499/02, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2006). Sentencia en Inglés.
(2006)[Health insurance denied claim of woman who travelled to UK for abortion; case declared inadmissible because she did not exhaust domestic remedies regarding the availability of abortion in Ireland in cases of fatal fetal ... -
Costa and Pavan v. Italy, No. 54270/10, 28th August 2012, Sentencia en Inglés.
(2012)[re assisted reproduction and abortion for healthy carriers of cystic fibrosis] -
Boso v. Italy, App. No. 50490/99,Eur. Ct. H.R. (2002). Sentencia en Inglés
(2002)[Inadmissible: complaint of a man whose wife had had a legal abortion without his consent; a man's rights to private and family life and right to marriage and family yield to the mother's rights because she is the primary ... -
A, B, and C v. Ireland, [2010] E.C.H.R. 2032, Sentencia en Inglés.
(2010)[Ireland's restrictive abortion law did not violate the ECHR. However, Ireland's failure to adopt legislation and effective and accessible procedure for women to access lawful abortions under that scheme was a violation ... -
Caso Artavia Murillo y otros (Fecundación in vitro) vs. Costa Rica, Sentencia de 28 de noviembre de 2012. Serie C No. 257. Sentencia en español.
(2012)[Costa Rica violated the right to private and family life, right to protection of family and equality before law by banning in-vitro fertilization; right to life in American Convention is not absolute, but rather gradual, ... -
Medida Cautelar MC -270/09 otorgada a favor de X y XX contra Colombia, 21 de septiembre de 2009., Resumen en español. Medida cautelares en español.
(2009)[Inadmissible for lack of standing; petitioner could not claim to be a "victim".] [Precautionary measures granted to protect a mother and daughter in Colombia; daughter had been sexually assaulted and was carrying a ... -
Resolución No. 23/81, Caso 2141 (“Baby Boy”) interpuesto por los Sres. White y Potter contra los Estados Unidos de América, OAS/Ser.L/V/II.54, doc. 9 rev. 1, 6 de marzo de 1981. Sentencia en español.
(1981)[Abortion scheme in US did not violate the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man nor the American Convention on Human Rights; right to life does not begin at conception in the Declaration, which prevails ... -
Informe Nº21/07, Petición 161-02, Solución Amistosa, Paulina del Carmen Ramirez Jacinto contra México, 9 de marzo de 2007. Sentencia en español
(2007)[Mexico denied a raped minor a legal abortion; friendly settlement reached.] -
Caso 13-378, Informe No. 09/20, Beatriz v. El Salvador, Inter-Am. C.H.R. (2020) Sentencia en espanol. Extra copia.. Submitted to Inter-American Court of Human Rights Jan. 5, 2022. Sumario en Español.
(2020)[Woman with lupus and kidney failure denied abortion for fetus with anencephaly.] -
X v. Austria, App. No. 7045/75, Eur. Comm’n H.R. (1976). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1976)[Application which challenged Austrian penal code decriminalizing abortion within first three months was ruled inadmissible, because the applicant, being male, did not have standing] -
Paton (W.P.) v. United Kingdom, App. No. 8416/78, Eur. Comm’n H.R. (1980). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1980)[man's application surrounding his partner having an abortion without his consent declared inadmissible; Commission noted that this claim was manifestly ill-founded and the woman had the abortion to protect her own life]
