Clasificación por fuente: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 481-500 de 1487
-
Costa and Pavan v. Italy, No. 54270/10, 28th August 2012, Sentencia en Inglés.
(2012)[re assisted reproduction and abortion for healthy carriers of cystic fibrosis] -
Boso v. Italy, App. No. 50490/99,Eur. Ct. H.R. (2002). Sentencia en Inglés
(2002)[Inadmissible: complaint of a man whose wife had had a legal abortion without his consent; a man's rights to private and family life and right to marriage and family yield to the mother's rights because she is the primary ... -
A, B, and C v. Ireland, [2010] E.C.H.R. 2032, Sentencia en Inglés.
(2010)[Ireland's restrictive abortion law did not violate the ECHR. However, Ireland's failure to adopt legislation and effective and accessible procedure for women to access lawful abortions under that scheme was a violation ... -
Caso Artavia Murillo y otros (Fecundación in vitro) vs. Costa Rica, Sentencia de 28 de noviembre de 2012. Serie C No. 257. Sentencia en español.
(2012)[Costa Rica violated the right to private and family life, right to protection of family and equality before law by banning in-vitro fertilization; right to life in American Convention is not absolute, but rather gradual, ... -
Medida Cautelar MC -270/09 otorgada a favor de X y XX contra Colombia, 21 de septiembre de 2009., Resumen en español. Medida cautelares en español.
(2009)[Inadmissible for lack of standing; petitioner could not claim to be a "victim".] [Precautionary measures granted to protect a mother and daughter in Colombia; daughter had been sexually assaulted and was carrying a ... -
Resolución No. 23/81, Caso 2141 (“Baby Boy”) interpuesto por los Sres. White y Potter contra los Estados Unidos de América, OAS/Ser.L/V/II.54, doc. 9 rev. 1, 6 de marzo de 1981. Sentencia en español.
(1981)[Abortion scheme in US did not violate the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man nor the American Convention on Human Rights; right to life does not begin at conception in the Declaration, which prevails ... -
Informe Nº21/07, Petición 161-02, Solución Amistosa, Paulina del Carmen Ramirez Jacinto contra México, 9 de marzo de 2007. Sentencia en español
(2007)[Mexico denied a raped minor a legal abortion; friendly settlement reached.] -
Caso 13-378, Informe No. 09/20, Beatriz v. El Salvador, Inter-Am. C.H.R. (2020) Sentencia en espanol. Extra copia.. Submitted to Inter-American Court of Human Rights Jan. 5, 2022. Sumario en Español.
(2020)[Woman with lupus and kidney failure denied abortion for fetus with anencephaly.] -
X v. Austria, App. No. 7045/75, Eur. Comm’n H.R. (1976). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1976)[Application which challenged Austrian penal code decriminalizing abortion within first three months was ruled inadmissible, because the applicant, being male, did not have standing] -
Paton (W.P.) v. United Kingdom, App. No. 8416/78, Eur. Comm’n H.R. (1980). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1980)[man's application surrounding his partner having an abortion without his consent declared inadmissible; Commission noted that this claim was manifestly ill-founded and the woman had the abortion to protect her own life] -
Hercz (R.H.) v. Norway, App. No. 17004/90,Eur. Comm’n H.R. (1992). Sentencia en Inglés
(1992)[man's complaint that his partner had an abortion notwithstanding his objection to the procedure was declared inadmissible] -
Brüggemann and Scheuten v. Federal Republic of Germany, App. No. 6959/75 (1981) 3 E.H.R.R. 244. Sentencia en Inglés
(1981)[German law which criminalized abortion except under certain circumstances did not breach Article 8; a woman’s private life becomes closely connected with the developing fetus] -
Mildred Mapingure v. Minister Of Home Affairs and 2 Others (2014), Judgment No. SC 22/14, Civil Appeal No. SC 406/12 (Zimbabwe, Supreme Court). Sentencia en inglés.
(2014)[police officer and doctor failed to carry out their professional duties; their delays and omissions ended up denying a rape victim an abortion] -
El Tribunal Constitucional del Reino de Tailandia, Sentencia no. 4 de 2563 (2020) ordena la revisión del Código Penal sección 301, que viola las Secciones 27 o 28 de la Constitución de 2017, que respaldan la igualdad de derechos entre hombres y mujeres, así como el derecho y la libertad de todos en su vida y persona. Decisión de 19 de febrero de 2020. Sumario de Corte en ingles)
(2020)[Declared unconstitutional: Criminal Code section 301, allowing a fine or up to three years in prison for a woman who had an abortion; Court ordered revision of this section.] -
Corte Suprema de Apelaciones, Christian Lawyers Association v. Minister of Health and Others, [2004] 4 All SA 31. Sentencia en inglés.
(2004)[Constitutional ruling that "women" in Choice of Termination of Pregnancy Act includes girls under 18, without consent of a guardian, with counselling or a cooling off period.] -
Cámara de los Lores, Royal College of Nurses v. Department of Health and Social Security [1981] 1 All E.R. 545.
(1981)[nurses are legally protected from liability when they are involved in abortions in accordance with the 1967 Abortion Act] -
Tribunal de la Corona de Inglaterra y Gales, R. v. Sarah Louise Catt [2013] EWCA Crim 1187. Sentencia en inglés
(2013)[sentence of woman who pled guilty to administering poison with intent to procure a miscarriage was reduced from 8 years to 3.5 years] -
Tribunal de la Corona de Inglaterra y Gales, R. v. Bourne [1938] 3 All E.R. 615. Resumen y Sentencia en inglés
(1938)[doctor acquitted of performing an abortion on a 14-year-old girl who was gang raped by soldiers, because the woman's life was reasonably thought to be in danger] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, Queen’s Bench Division, R. (on the application of Smeaton) v. Secretary of State for Health, [2002] E.W.H.C. 610. (Admin). Sentencia en inglés.
(2002)prescription, supply and use of emergency contraception does not constitute a criminal offence; emergency contraceptives do not cause miscarriage, because a miscarriage is the termination of an established pregnancy] -
R (on the Application of Crowter and Ors) v SSHSC [2021] EWHC 2536 (Admin) Case No. CO/2066/2020 (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, London) Sept 23, 2021. Judgment and summary
(2020)[fetus has no established rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), so UK abortion law allowing legal abortions in cases of severe fetal abnormalities is compatible with ECHR.]
