Clasificación por fuente: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 501-520 de 1487
-
Petition of Mary Teresa Doogan and Concepta Wood, [2013] C.S.I.H. 36. P876/11 Sentencia en inglés
(2013)[overturned 2012 decision, ruling that right to conscientious objection does extend to those supervising health professionals who perform abortions - (but see 2014 case: Greater Glasgow..., above)] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, Queen’s Bench Division, Paton v. Trustees of British Pregnancy Advisory Service and Another [1978] QB 276 Casa Exterior, Tribunal de Sesión (Escocia) [Outer House, Court of Session, Scotland]. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1978)[husband has no right to stop his wife from obtaining an abortion] -
Greater Glasgow Health Board v. Doogan and another, [2014] UKSC 68 (on appeal from [2013] CSIH 36), December 14, 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Decision online.
(2014)[right to conscientious objection does not extend to those supervising the health professionals who perform abortions] -
Cámara de los Lores, Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. 3 All E.R. 402 (1985). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1985)[doctors can provide advice and contraceptives to girls under the age of 16 without their parents' knowledge or consent] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health. [2011] E.W.H.C. 235 (Admin). Sentencia en Inglés.
(2011)[interpretation of Abortion Act 1967: women must take first and second doses of pills for medical abortions in a hospital or other health facility] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 75/2010, Diario da Republica vol. 60, 2010.. Sentencia en portugués.
(2010)[upheld as constitutional: law allowing abortion upon request within first 10 weeks: if performed under a doctor’s direction, at an officially recognized health facility, after a mandatory information session and a 3 day ... -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 617/2006, Diário da República I Série, 2006.. Sentencia en portugués
(2006)[The referendum question whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks if completed in a legally authorized health care establishment was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 288/98, Diário da República 91/98 Suplemento I-A Série, 1998. Sentencia en portugués.
(1998)[The referendum question asking the public whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 85/85, Acórdãos do Tribunal Constitucional V,1985. Sentencia en portugués
(1985)[upheld law decriminalizing abortion in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s health or fetal abnormalities] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 25/84, Acórdãos do Tribunal Constitucional II, 1984. Sentencia en portugués.
(1984)[upheld law decriminalizing abortion in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s health or fetal abnormalities] -
Trybunal Konstitucyjny [Constitutional Tribunal] Case No. K 1/20 (OTK ZU A/2021, item 4, October 22, 2020). Press Release in Polish. Auto-translation to English. Comments by scholars, 2021
(2021)[court held unconstitutional an exception in the Family Planning Act of 1993 that provided for legal abortion in cases of fetal abnormalities. Result: almost total ban on abortion.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, K 26/96, Orzecznictwo Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, Rok 1997, 28 de mayo de 1997. Sentencia en polaco. Extra copia. Sentencia en inglés
(1997)[abortion law allowing abortions up to 12 weeks for financial, emotional reasons struck down as unconstitutional] -
Tribunal Constitucional ONG Acción de Lucha Anticorrupción Sin Componenda c.MINSA (Ministerio de Salud), Exp. N° 02005-2009-PA/TC, 16 de octubre de 2009
(2009)[Constitutional Court revoked 2006 decision; ordered Ministry of Health to stop distributing emergency contraception to the public sector.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Sentencia Exp. No. 7435-2006-PC/TC, 13 de Noviembre de 2006. Sentencia en español.
(2006)[Constitutional Court enforced Department of Health decision to provide emergency oral contraceptives free of charge throughout Peru, including access to the contraception and relevant information.] -
NZ Health Professionals’ Alliance v Attorney-General, [2021] NZHC 2510 (*New Zealand High Court) Decision online. Commentary on decision
(2021)[conscientious objection includes duty of effective referral; and employers must accommodate conscientious objection unless doing so would cause unreasonable disruption.] -
Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2012] NZSC 68, 9 de agosto de 2012.Descargar Sentencia en Inglés.
(2012)[appeal of 2008 case dismissed; Advisory Committee could question consultants about how they were making decisions approving abortion under relevant law, but could not investigate decisions made in individual cases.] -
Tribunal Superior de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2008] 2 NZLR 825, 9 de junio de 2008. Descargar Sentencia en Inglés
(2008)[upheld law allowing abortion if continued pregnancy would result in serious danger to woman’s life or physical and mental health; noted that law is applied more liberally than Parliament intended, so review is necessary] -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Prakash Mani Sharma v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 064, 2008. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés.
(2008)[Court action brought over government inaction relating to uterus prolapse; constitutional rights of reproductive health are fundamental, non-derogable, non-restrictive and require meaningful implementation by the state, ... -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Meera Dhungana v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 55, 2058, 2002. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés
(2002)[Rape law is unconstitutional because it excluded marital rape; legislature to create new rape law, consistent with decision of the Court.] -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Lakshmi Dhikta v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 0757, 2067, Nepal Kanoon Patrika, 2009. Sentencia y el resumen en inglés.
(2009)[woman could not afford a legal abortion was forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy and give birth; Court held government has to guarantee safe and affordable abortion services including establishing a fund for abortion costs.]
