Clasificación por fuente: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 521-540 de 1513
-
Corte Suprema de Apelaciones, Christian Lawyers Association v. Minister of Health and Others, [2004] 4 All SA 31. Sentencia en inglés.
(2004)[Constitutional ruling that "women" in Choice of Termination of Pregnancy Act includes girls under 18, without consent of a guardian, with counselling or a cooling off period.] -
Cámara de los Lores, Royal College of Nurses v. Department of Health and Social Security [1981] 1 All E.R. 545.
(1981)[nurses are legally protected from liability when they are involved in abortions in accordance with the 1967 Abortion Act] -
Tribunal de la Corona de Inglaterra y Gales, R. v. Sarah Louise Catt [2013] EWCA Crim 1187. Sentencia en inglés
(2013)[sentence of woman who pled guilty to administering poison with intent to procure a miscarriage was reduced from 8 years to 3.5 years] -
Tribunal de la Corona de Inglaterra y Gales, R. v. Bourne [1938] 3 All E.R. 615. Resumen y Sentencia en inglés
(1938)[doctor acquitted of performing an abortion on a 14-year-old girl who was gang raped by soldiers, because the woman's life was reasonably thought to be in danger] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, Queen’s Bench Division, R. (on the application of Smeaton) v. Secretary of State for Health, [2002] E.W.H.C. 610. (Admin). Sentencia en inglés.
(2002)prescription, supply and use of emergency contraception does not constitute a criminal offence; emergency contraceptives do not cause miscarriage, because a miscarriage is the termination of an established pregnancy] -
R (on the Application of Crowter and Ors) v SSHSC [2021] EWHC 2536 (Admin) Case No. CO/2066/2020 (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, London) Sept 23, 2021. Judgment and summary
(2020)[fetus has no established rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), so UK abortion law allowing legal abortions in cases of severe fetal abnormalities is compatible with ECHR.] -
Petition of Mary Teresa Doogan and Concepta Wood, [2013] C.S.I.H. 36. P876/11 Sentencia en inglés
(2013)[overturned 2012 decision, ruling that right to conscientious objection does extend to those supervising health professionals who perform abortions - (but see 2014 case: Greater Glasgow..., above)] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, Queen’s Bench Division, Paton v. Trustees of British Pregnancy Advisory Service and Another [1978] QB 276 Casa Exterior, Tribunal de Sesión (Escocia) [Outer House, Court of Session, Scotland]. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1978)[husband has no right to stop his wife from obtaining an abortion] -
Greater Glasgow Health Board v. Doogan and another, [2014] UKSC 68 (on appeal from [2013] CSIH 36), December 14, 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Decision online.
(2014)[right to conscientious objection does not extend to those supervising the health professionals who perform abortions] -
Cámara de los Lores, Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. 3 All E.R. 402 (1985). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1985)[doctors can provide advice and contraceptives to girls under the age of 16 without their parents' knowledge or consent] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health. [2011] E.W.H.C. 235 (Admin). Sentencia en Inglés.
(2011)[interpretation of Abortion Act 1967: women must take first and second doses of pills for medical abortions in a hospital or other health facility] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 75/2010, Diario da Republica vol. 60, 2010.. Sentencia en portugués.
(2010)[upheld as constitutional: law allowing abortion upon request within first 10 weeks: if performed under a doctor’s direction, at an officially recognized health facility, after a mandatory information session and a 3 day ... -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 617/2006, Diário da República I Série, 2006.. Sentencia en portugués
(2006)[The referendum question whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks if completed in a legally authorized health care establishment was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 288/98, Diário da República 91/98 Suplemento I-A Série, 1998. Sentencia en portugués.
(1998)[The referendum question asking the public whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 85/85, Acórdãos do Tribunal Constitucional V,1985. Sentencia en portugués
(1985)[upheld law decriminalizing abortion in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s health or fetal abnormalities] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 25/84, Acórdãos do Tribunal Constitucional II, 1984. Sentencia en portugués.
(1984)[upheld law decriminalizing abortion in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s health or fetal abnormalities] -
Trybunal Konstitucyjny [Constitutional Tribunal] Case No. K 1/20 (OTK ZU A/2021, item 4, October 22, 2020). Press Release in Polish. Auto-translation to English. Comments by scholars, 2021
(2021)[court held unconstitutional an exception in the Family Planning Act of 1993 that provided for legal abortion in cases of fetal abnormalities. Result: almost total ban on abortion.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, K 26/96, Orzecznictwo Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, Rok 1997, 28 de mayo de 1997. Sentencia en polaco. Extra copia. Sentencia en inglés
(1997)[abortion law allowing abortions up to 12 weeks for financial, emotional reasons struck down as unconstitutional] -
Tribunal Constitucional ONG Acción de Lucha Anticorrupción Sin Componenda c.MINSA (Ministerio de Salud), Exp. N° 02005-2009-PA/TC, 16 de octubre de 2009
(2009)[Constitutional Court revoked 2006 decision; ordered Ministry of Health to stop distributing emergency contraception to the public sector.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Sentencia Exp. No. 7435-2006-PC/TC, 13 de Noviembre de 2006. Sentencia en español.
(2006)[Constitutional Court enforced Department of Health decision to provide emergency oral contraceptives free of charge throughout Peru, including access to the contraception and relevant information.]
