2. América Latina y el Caribe: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 61-80 de 876
-
Comunicación 1153/2003, K.L. v. Perú, Decisión de 17 de noviembre de 2005, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/85/D/1153/2003. Sentencia en español
(2005)[Peru violated 17-year-old girl's rights. Minor was pregnant with anencephalic fetus and was denied a legal abortion; she was forced to give birth and developed severe depression following infant's death four days after ... -
Comunicación Nº1608/2007, L.M.R. v. Argentina, Decisión de 28 de abril de 2011, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/101/D/1608/2007.. Sentencia en español.
(2011)[Raped woman with a mental disability experienced significant delay in trying to obtain a legal abortion; by the time she could obtain an abortion it was denied on the basis that the pregnancy was too advanced which caused ... -
Resolución Nº 887. Adhesión a disposiciones nacionales relacionadas con la atención en materia de abortos
(Ministerio de Salud. Santa Fe, 2009) -
Caso Artavia Murillo y otros (Fecundación in vitro) vs. Costa Rica, Sentencia de 28 de noviembre de 2012. Serie C No. 257. Sentencia en español.
(2012)[Costa Rica violated the right to private and family life, right to protection of family and equality before law by banning in-vitro fertilization; right to life in American Convention is not absolute, but rather gradual, ... -
Medida Cautelar MC -270/09 otorgada a favor de X y XX contra Colombia, 21 de septiembre de 2009., Resumen en español. Medida cautelares en español.
(2009)[Inadmissible for lack of standing; petitioner could not claim to be a "victim".] [Precautionary measures granted to protect a mother and daughter in Colombia; daughter had been sexually assaulted and was carrying a ... -
Informe Nº21/07, Petición 161-02, Solución Amistosa, Paulina del Carmen Ramirez Jacinto contra México, 9 de marzo de 2007. Sentencia en español
(2007)[Mexico denied a raped minor a legal abortion; friendly settlement reached.] -
Caso 13-378, Informe No. 09/20, Beatriz v. El Salvador, Inter-Am. C.H.R. (2020) Sentencia en espanol. Extra copia.. Submitted to Inter-American Court of Human Rights Jan. 5, 2022. Sumario en Español.
(2020)[Woman with lupus and kidney failure denied abortion for fetus with anencephaly.] -
Tribunal Constitucional ONG Acción de Lucha Anticorrupción Sin Componenda c.MINSA (Ministerio de Salud), Exp. N° 02005-2009-PA/TC, 16 de octubre de 2009
(2009)[Constitutional Court revoked 2006 decision; ordered Ministry of Health to stop distributing emergency contraception to the public sector.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Sentencia Exp. No. 7435-2006-PC/TC, 13 de Noviembre de 2006. Sentencia en español.
(2006)[Constitutional Court enforced Department of Health decision to provide emergency oral contraceptives free of charge throughout Peru, including access to the contraception and relevant information.] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación [Supreme Court] 2021, Acción de inconstitucionalidad AI 106/2018 and 107/2018), Sept. 7, 2021. Sentencia en español.
(2021)[states may not establish a right to life from the moment of conception in their local constitutions] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación [Supreme Court] 2021, Acción de inconstitucionalidad AI 54/2018, Sept 21, 2021. Sentencia en español
(2021)struck down part of the General Law regulating health services nationwide, because it established an expansive right to conscientious objection by medical personnel, without establishing the limits necessary to ensure ... -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación [Supreme Court] 2021, Acción de inconstitucionalidad AI 148/2017, Sept 7, 2021 Sentencia en español
(2021)[criminalizing abortion is unconstitutional; state interests in protecting fetus cannot outweigh the reproductive rights of women.] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Primera Sala [Supreme Court] 2019, Amparo en Revisión 1388/2015 [Case of "Marisa"] May 15, 2019. Sentencia en español.
(2019)denying access to abortion is a violation of the right to health; the right to health involves a woman’s own perception and knowledge about her own standard of wellness -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Segunda Sala [Supreme Court] 2018, Amparo en Revisión 1170/2017 [Caso de "Fernanda"] (Ciudad de Mexico) April 18, 2018. Sentencia en español.
(2018)[woman's denial of a legal abortion after rape was a violation of her rights] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Segunda Sala 2018, Amparo en Revisión 601/2017 [Caso de "Marimar"] (Ciudad de Mexico) April 4, 2018. Sentencia en español
(2017)[woman's denial of a legal abortion after rape was a violation of her rights] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Acción de inconstitucionalidad 62/2009, 2011. (San Luis Potosí). Sentencia en español.
(2011)[upheld amendment to state constitution that life begins at conception which had the effect of limiting abortions) -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Acción de inconstitucionalidad 11/2009, 2011. (Baja California) Sentencia en español.
(2011)[upheld amendment to its state constitution that life begins at conception which had the effect of limiting abortions) -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Controversia constitucional 54/2009, 2010. Documento en español
(2010)[upheld as constitutional a federal health directive requiring health professionals to offer rape victims emergency contraception and legal abortion.] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Acción de inconstitucionalidad 10/2000, 31 de enero de 2002. Sentencia en español
(2002)[upheld constitutionality of Federal District amendment to penal code which allowed abortion in cases of rape, unwanted artificial insemination, fetal malformations and danger to the mother’s health.] -
Supreme Court of El Salvador, Sentencia 18/98 (Inconstitucionalidad), Nov 20, 2007. Sentencia en español.
(2007)Law criminalizing all abortion upheld as constitutional.
