Jurisprudencia: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 41-60 de 183
-
C-355/2006. Extractos de la sentencia de la Corte Constitucional que liberalizó la sentencia de la Corte Constitucional que liberalizó el aborto en Colombia,
(Women’s Link Worldwide, 2007)El 10 de Mayo de 2006 la Corte Constitucional colombiana anuncio una decisión histórica; el aborto no podía seguir considerándose un delito en tres cir- cunstancias: cuando la vida o la salud (física o mental) de la mujer ... -
Tribunal de Apelación de África Oriental, Mehar Singh Bansel v. R., (1959) E.A.L.R. 813
(1959)[upheld doctor's conviction of manslaughter for abortion-related death] -
Mildred Mapingure v. Minister Of Home Affairs and 2 Others (2014), Judgment No. SC 22/14, Civil Appeal No. SC 406/12 (Zimbabwe, Supreme Court). Sentencia en inglés.
(2014)[police officer and doctor failed to carry out their professional duties; their delays and omissions ended up denying a rape victim an abortion] -
El Tribunal Constitucional del Reino de Tailandia, Sentencia no. 4 de 2563 (2020) ordena la revisión del Código Penal sección 301, que viola las Secciones 27 o 28 de la Constitución de 2017, que respaldan la igualdad de derechos entre hombres y mujeres, así como el derecho y la libertad de todos en su vida y persona. Decisión de 19 de febrero de 2020. Sumario de Corte en ingles)
(2020)[Declared unconstitutional: Criminal Code section 301, allowing a fine or up to three years in prison for a woman who had an abortion; Court ordered revision of this section.] -
Corte Suprema de Apelaciones, Christian Lawyers Association v. Minister of Health and Others, [2004] 4 All SA 31. Sentencia en inglés.
(2004)[Constitutional ruling that "women" in Choice of Termination of Pregnancy Act includes girls under 18, without consent of a guardian, with counselling or a cooling off period.] -
Cámara de los Lores, Royal College of Nurses v. Department of Health and Social Security [1981] 1 All E.R. 545.
(1981)[nurses are legally protected from liability when they are involved in abortions in accordance with the 1967 Abortion Act] -
Tribunal de la Corona de Inglaterra y Gales, R. v. Sarah Louise Catt [2013] EWCA Crim 1187. Sentencia en inglés
(2013)[sentence of woman who pled guilty to administering poison with intent to procure a miscarriage was reduced from 8 years to 3.5 years] -
Tribunal de la Corona de Inglaterra y Gales, R. v. Bourne [1938] 3 All E.R. 615. Resumen y Sentencia en inglés
(1938)[doctor acquitted of performing an abortion on a 14-year-old girl who was gang raped by soldiers, because the woman's life was reasonably thought to be in danger] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, Queen’s Bench Division, R. (on the application of Smeaton) v. Secretary of State for Health, [2002] E.W.H.C. 610. (Admin). Sentencia en inglés.
(2002)prescription, supply and use of emergency contraception does not constitute a criminal offence; emergency contraceptives do not cause miscarriage, because a miscarriage is the termination of an established pregnancy] -
R (on the Application of Crowter and Ors) v SSHSC [2021] EWHC 2536 (Admin) Case No. CO/2066/2020 (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, London) Sept 23, 2021. Judgment and summary
(2020)[fetus has no established rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), so UK abortion law allowing legal abortions in cases of severe fetal abnormalities is compatible with ECHR.] -
Petition of Mary Teresa Doogan and Concepta Wood, [2013] C.S.I.H. 36. P876/11 Sentencia en inglés
(2013)[overturned 2012 decision, ruling that right to conscientious objection does extend to those supervising health professionals who perform abortions - (but see 2014 case: Greater Glasgow..., above)] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, Queen’s Bench Division, Paton v. Trustees of British Pregnancy Advisory Service and Another [1978] QB 276 Casa Exterior, Tribunal de Sesión (Escocia) [Outer House, Court of Session, Scotland]. Sentencia en Inglés.
(1978)[husband has no right to stop his wife from obtaining an abortion] -
Greater Glasgow Health Board v. Doogan and another, [2014] UKSC 68 (on appeal from [2013] CSIH 36), December 14, 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Decision online.
(2014)[right to conscientious objection does not extend to those supervising the health professionals who perform abortions] -
Cámara de los Lores, Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. 3 All E.R. 402 (1985). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1985)[doctors can provide advice and contraceptives to girls under the age of 16 without their parents' knowledge or consent] -
Tribunal Superior de Inglaterra y Gales, British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health. [2011] E.W.H.C. 235 (Admin). Sentencia en Inglés.
(2011)[interpretation of Abortion Act 1967: women must take first and second doses of pills for medical abortions in a hospital or other health facility] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 75/2010, Diario da Republica vol. 60, 2010.. Sentencia en portugués.
(2010)[upheld as constitutional: law allowing abortion upon request within first 10 weeks: if performed under a doctor’s direction, at an officially recognized health facility, after a mandatory information session and a 3 day ... -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 617/2006, Diário da República I Série, 2006.. Sentencia en portugués
(2006)[The referendum question whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks if completed in a legally authorized health care establishment was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 288/98, Diário da República 91/98 Suplemento I-A Série, 1998. Sentencia en portugués.
(1998)[The referendum question asking the public whether abortion should be decriminalized within the first 10 weeks was constitutional and legal.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 85/85, Acórdãos do Tribunal Constitucional V,1985. Sentencia en portugués
(1985)[upheld law decriminalizing abortion in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s health or fetal abnormalities] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Acórdão No. 25/84, Acórdãos do Tribunal Constitucional II, 1984. Sentencia en portugués.
(1984)[upheld law decriminalizing abortion in cases of rape, risk to the woman’s health or fetal abnormalities]
