Jurisprudencia: Envíos recientes
Mostrando ítems 61-80 de 183
-
Tribunal Constitucional, K 26/96, Orzecznictwo Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, Rok 1997, 28 de mayo de 1997. Sentencia en polaco. Extra copia. Sentencia en inglés
(1997)[abortion law allowing abortions up to 12 weeks for financial, emotional reasons struck down as unconstitutional] -
Tribunal Constitucional ONG Acción de Lucha Anticorrupción Sin Componenda c.MINSA (Ministerio de Salud), Exp. N° 02005-2009-PA/TC, 16 de octubre de 2009
(2009)[Constitutional Court revoked 2006 decision; ordered Ministry of Health to stop distributing emergency contraception to the public sector.] -
Tribunal Constitucional, Sentencia Exp. No. 7435-2006-PC/TC, 13 de Noviembre de 2006. Sentencia en español.
(2006)[Constitutional Court enforced Department of Health decision to provide emergency oral contraceptives free of charge throughout Peru, including access to the contraception and relevant information.] -
NZ Health Professionals’ Alliance v Attorney-General, [2021] NZHC 2510 (*New Zealand High Court) Decision online. Commentary on decision
(2021)[conscientious objection includes duty of effective referral; and employers must accommodate conscientious objection unless doing so would cause unreasonable disruption.] -
Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2012] NZSC 68, 9 de agosto de 2012.Descargar Sentencia en Inglés.
(2012)[appeal of 2008 case dismissed; Advisory Committee could question consultants about how they were making decisions approving abortion under relevant law, but could not investigate decisions made in individual cases.] -
Tribunal Superior de Nueva Zelanda, Right to Life New Zealand Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee, [2008] 2 NZLR 825, 9 de junio de 2008. Descargar Sentencia en Inglés
(2008)[upheld law allowing abortion if continued pregnancy would result in serious danger to woman’s life or physical and mental health; noted that law is applied more liberally than Parliament intended, so review is necessary] -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Prakash Mani Sharma v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 064, 2008. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés.
(2008)[Court action brought over government inaction relating to uterus prolapse; constitutional rights of reproductive health are fundamental, non-derogable, non-restrictive and require meaningful implementation by the state, ... -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Meera Dhungana v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 55, 2058, 2002. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés
(2002)[Rape law is unconstitutional because it excluded marital rape; legislature to create new rape law, consistent with decision of the Court.] -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Lakshmi Dhikta v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 0757, 2067, Nepal Kanoon Patrika, 2009. Sentencia y el resumen en inglés.
(2009)[woman could not afford a legal abortion was forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy and give birth; Court held government has to guarantee safe and affordable abortion services including establishing a fund for abortion costs.] -
Corte Suprema de Nepal, Achyut Kharel v. Government of Nepal, Writ No. 3352, 2061, 2008. Sentencia de Nepal traducidos al inglés.
(2008)law allowing abortion on request of woman within first 12 weeks upheld; no paternal consent required. -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación [Supreme Court] 2021, Acción de inconstitucionalidad AI 106/2018 and 107/2018), Sept. 7, 2021. Sentencia en español.
(2021)[states may not establish a right to life from the moment of conception in their local constitutions] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación [Supreme Court] 2021, Acción de inconstitucionalidad AI 54/2018, Sept 21, 2021. Sentencia en español
(2021)struck down part of the General Law regulating health services nationwide, because it established an expansive right to conscientious objection by medical personnel, without establishing the limits necessary to ensure ... -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación [Supreme Court] 2021, Acción de inconstitucionalidad AI 148/2017, Sept 7, 2021 Sentencia en español
(2021)[criminalizing abortion is unconstitutional; state interests in protecting fetus cannot outweigh the reproductive rights of women.] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Primera Sala [Supreme Court] 2019, Amparo en Revisión 1388/2015 [Case of "Marisa"] May 15, 2019. Sentencia en español.
(2019)denying access to abortion is a violation of the right to health; the right to health involves a woman’s own perception and knowledge about her own standard of wellness -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Segunda Sala [Supreme Court] 2018, Amparo en Revisión 1170/2017 [Caso de "Fernanda"] (Ciudad de Mexico) April 18, 2018. Sentencia en español.
(2018)[woman's denial of a legal abortion after rape was a violation of her rights] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Segunda Sala 2018, Amparo en Revisión 601/2017 [Caso de "Marimar"] (Ciudad de Mexico) April 4, 2018. Sentencia en español
(2017)[woman's denial of a legal abortion after rape was a violation of her rights] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Acción de inconstitucionalidad 62/2009, 2011. (San Luis Potosí). Sentencia en español.
(2011)[upheld amendment to state constitution that life begins at conception which had the effect of limiting abortions) -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Acción de inconstitucionalidad 11/2009, 2011. (Baja California) Sentencia en español.
(2011)[upheld amendment to its state constitution that life begins at conception which had the effect of limiting abortions) -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Controversia constitucional 54/2009, 2010. Documento en español
(2010)[upheld as constitutional a federal health directive requiring health professionals to offer rape victims emergency contraception and legal abortion.] -
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Acción de inconstitucionalidad 10/2000, 31 de enero de 2002. Sentencia en español
(2002)[upheld constitutionality of Federal District amendment to penal code which allowed abortion in cases of rape, unwanted artificial insemination, fetal malformations and danger to the mother’s health.]
