Minors’ Access to Contraceptive Services
Resumen
Over the past 30 years, states have expanded minors’ authority to consent to health care, including care related to sexual activity. This trend reflects U.S. Supreme Court rulings extending the constitutional right to privacy to a minor’s decision to obtain contraceptives and concluding that rights do not “come into being magically only when one attains the state-defined age of majority.” It also reflects the recognition that while parental involvement is desirable, many minors will remain sexually active but not seek services if they have to tell their parents. As a result, confidentiality is vital to ensuring minors’ access to contraceptive services. Even when a state has no relevant policy or case law, physicians may commonly provide medical care to a mature minor without parental consent, particularly if the state allows a minor to consent to related health services.
Colecciones
- Guttmacher Institute [33]
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.
-
Minors’ Rights as Parents
Guttmacher Institute (Guttmacher Institute, 2011-08)Many states require parental involvement in a minor’s decision to terminate a pregnancy. In sharp contrast, states overwhelmingly consider minors who are parents to be capable of making critical decisions affecting the ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622. (1979). Sentencia en inglés.
Autor desconocido (1979)Massachusetts law on parental consent declared unconstitutional; where a state requires a minor to obtain parental consent before procuring abortion, there must also be an alternative procedure for a minor to procure ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976). Sentencia en Inglés.
Autor desconocido (1976)Declared unconstitutional: a Missouri law requiring spousal consent for a woman to obtain an abortion, and requiring parental consent for a minor to obtain an abortion]