Navegação Estados Unidos por data do documento
Itens para a visualização no momento 1-20 of 27
-
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
(U.S. Supreme Court, 1973)El día 22 de enero de 1973, la Corte Suprema de los EE.UU. encontró que la ley de Texas era inconstitucional y decidió que el derecho constitucional a la privacidad era “lo suficientemente amplia para incluir la decisión ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Sentencia en inglés
(1973)14th amendment right to privacy protects a woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion; the right is not absolute and must be balanced against government interests in protecting prenatal health; trimester model was ... -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976). Sentencia en Inglés.
(1976)Declared unconstitutional: a Missouri law requiring spousal consent for a woman to obtain an abortion, and requiring parental consent for a minor to obtain an abortion] -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622. (1979). Sentencia en inglés.
(1979)Massachusetts law on parental consent declared unconstitutional; where a state requires a minor to obtain parental consent before procuring abortion, there must also be an alternative procedure for a minor to procure ... -
Resolución No. 23/81, Caso 2141 (“Baby Boy”) interpuesto por los Sres. White y Potter contra los Estados Unidos de América, OAS/Ser.L/V/II.54, doc. 9 rev. 1, 6 de marzo de 1981. Sentencia en español.
(1981)[Abortion scheme in US did not violate the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man nor the American Convention on Human Rights; right to life does not begin at conception in the Declaration, which prevails ... -
Corte de Apelaciones del Segundo Distrito de California, Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital, 208 Cal. App. 3d 405; 256 Cal. Rptr. 240 (1989). Sentencia en inglés
(1989)Catholic hospital did not violate a law when it (1) refused to provide emergency contraception to a rape victim and (2) refused to inform her that she could obtain emergency contraception from a health professional within ... -
Corte Suprema de Oklahoma, In RE Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642, 1992 OK 122 (1992). Decisión en inglés.
(1992)Oklahoma Supreme Court prohibited ballot question on abortion because if it was answered in the affirmative, it would be unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Sentencia en inglés
(1992)Court upheld Roe v. Wade, new "undue burden" standard in assessing the validity of abortion laws; undue burden defined as “substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability” -
Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F. 3rd 771 (1998) (Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals). Decision online.
(1998)Illinois police officer who objected to abortion wanted to be exempt from providing security to abortion clinics on the basis that it acts as religious discrimination; court dismissed the claim] -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Sentencia en Inglés
(2000)Nebraska law banning partial-birth abortion without regard for health of the mother declared unconstitutional; Court used the undue burden standard developed in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey -
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007). Decisión en Inglés.
(2007)Court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban, a law which effectively banned most late-term abortions: states have an interest in preserving life and the ban fit into this interest as it did not create an undue burden on women -
An Overview of Abortion Laws
(Guttmacher Institute, 2011-08)Since the Supreme Court handed down its 1973 decisions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, states have constructed a lattice work of abortion law, codifying, regulating and limiting whether, when and under what circumstances ... -
Corte de Apelaciones del Octavo Circuito, Planned Parenthood of Minn., N.D. & S.D. v. Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, (2011). Sentencia revisado de 2012.
(2012)Upheld South Dakota law requiring doctors to inform abortion-seeking patients that abortions increased risk of suicide ideation and suicide; the law was not considered a violation of freedom of speech or due process rights. -
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016). Decision online. Backup copy. Commentary on case from Planned Parenthood.
(2016)ATexas law which required abortion providers to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centres and that abortion providers must have admitting privileges at a hosptial within 30 miles was declared unconstitutional ... -
La Global Gag Rule: Antecedentes, impacto y estrategias para contrarrestarla en América Latina
(Amnistía Internacional EEUU, 2017-11)Muestra que el Global Gag Rule condiciona a las ONG, hospitales y clínicas a que puedan recibir ayuda externa de los EEUU si es que cabildean sobre la reforma del aborto, aconseja a los pacientes sobre dónde recibir un ... -
A narrative analysis of antiabortion testimony and legislative debate related to Georgia’s fetal “heartbeat” abortion ban"
(Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 2020)Los proyectos de ley relativos a los latidos cardíacos fetales han pasado a ser la medida legislativa antiaborto preferida en la guerra de EE. UU. contra la salud y los derechos sexuales y reproductivos. En 2019, el Proyecto ... -
June Medical Services v. Russo 140 S.Ct. 2103 (2020). Decision online.
(2020)Declared unconstitutional a Louisiana law requiring doctors at abortion clinics to have hospital privileges at a state-authorized hospital within 30 miles of the clinic.
